One view is that the electric power system reform did not reach the target market requirements document, because the 19th (Editor's note: In 2007, the State Council issued "on the implementation of the" Eleventh Five-Year "deepen power system reform views")and No. 5 did not write the time and schedule of the electricity reform. But I think the reason why no write timetable Furthermore, we reform the overall guiding principle is "crossing the river by feeling the stones", the first completed step, on this basis, when the time is because it is difficult to give a timetable; ripe and then take the second step.
Recall that the reform and opening up 30 years walked the streets, then regardless of the stage of historical development, all of a sudden to copy the practices of Western countries, the reform is likely to be a failure. The reform is a gradual process, and the process of gradually deepening process we know. The railway reform shelving decade, or the power system reform has taken a good pace. If reform outset entirely in accordance with what it is today, the ministries are revoked, may change change fails.
If you want to reform once in place, may be a burden on society. Only separating government administration from enterprise management, separation of generation, although the opinion of the people of the old Ministry of Electric Power, but has not spread to go below. If then the transmission and distribution separate, separate main and auxiliary enterprises wider spread to people. If these problems are clear to go change, I estimated two to three years to change or not.
Go one step further than never go stronger, so the time to complete a phased task is to separate government from enterprises, Changwangfenkai. May lead to rebound more, till after the appropriate time to go to change. We do not want to produce too many social contradictions in the reform.
Some people criticize the power system reform, they should look at this issue from the historical background, it is better to understand.
没有评论:
发表评论